Thanks for your post Barb! We do appreciate all you do and keeping us updated on information you find. I believe the vast majority of the folks that visit this board belive you to be credible and quite sane.
Doubting Bro
JoinedPosts by Doubting Bro
-
147
Watch Tower Society Facing Criminal Charges and Indictment in Australia
by AndersonsInfo inandersonsinfo is reporting the following news about the "criminal charges and indictment of the watch tower society in australia" by taking some extracts from different parts of jehovah's witness, steven unthank's blog site, http://www.jwnews.net.
please go to the blog to understand the "indictment" and for detailed reading there is much more information found in a:.
pdf version of the 664 page document "the submission 2011" being the:.
-
-
-
11
house to house vs. in private homes
by DesirousOfChange indoes not matt 10 suggest that the household would not be those already in the faith?
"not deserving" or "does not take you in or listen".
matt 10:12-14 -- 12 when you are entering into the house, greet the household; 13 and if the house is deserving, let the peace you wish it come upon it; but if it is not deserving, let the peace from you return upon you.
-
-
Doubting Bro
Exactly Anoy Mous! Yet, there's a picture in a recent WT (or maybe it's the book on Acts that is currently being reviewed at the CBS) that shows 1st century Christians reading from a scroll at a householders door step. The drama last year showed an elder in the late 1st century reviewing the congregations records. Anyone that knows anything about what life was like in the 1st century realizes those scenes are complete fiction. Yet, JWs continue to eat it up.
-
147
Watch Tower Society Facing Criminal Charges and Indictment in Australia
by AndersonsInfo inandersonsinfo is reporting the following news about the "criminal charges and indictment of the watch tower society in australia" by taking some extracts from different parts of jehovah's witness, steven unthank's blog site, http://www.jwnews.net.
please go to the blog to understand the "indictment" and for detailed reading there is much more information found in a:.
pdf version of the 664 page document "the submission 2011" being the:.
-
-
Doubting Bro
This is very interesting. On the one hand, it appears Steven coming off looking a bit crazy but on the other hand, his point about non-compliance seems to be valid. Clearly, JWs are not exempt from the background check law. As others have stated, it would be better if he came across as a citizen concerned that JWs are going door to door where they can encounter childern without complying with the background check as opposed to what seems to me to be a disgruntled ex-JW who seems to still believe but thinks he needs to reform.
Still, the law is the law right? It seems pretty cut and dry so why has it taken so long? Perhaps he needs to partner with someone who has a bit less emotion and can present a less JW centric argument.
-
11
house to house vs. in private homes
by DesirousOfChange indoes not matt 10 suggest that the household would not be those already in the faith?
"not deserving" or "does not take you in or listen".
matt 10:12-14 -- 12 when you are entering into the house, greet the household; 13 and if the house is deserving, let the peace you wish it come upon it; but if it is not deserving, let the peace from you return upon you.
-
-
Doubting Bro
WHAT, they didn't drag around scrolls offering the latest issues of the 1st century Watchtower and Awakes for a denarius? And turn in time cards to the secretary for his records (as shown in the drama last year)?
-
26
Blondie's Comments You Will Not Hear at the 04-03-2011 WT Study (TRIAL)
by blondie inface persecution?.
helped to resist peer pressure.
(a) why can we expect to face trials and.
-
-
Doubting Bro
Mr. Falcon - exactly! If you really believed and had to go through an extended period of unemployment because you got fired for taking time off when your employer said no, how else could you take the fact you didn't get a new job making twice as much other than to conclude that you've somehow displeased Jehovah and he's withholding his blessing? These experiences may "encourage" those who aren't facing problems but to those who are in the same situation as the person in the "experience" its got to be demoralizing.
Given what I know about the individual who commented (an ex-elder who rarely comments, is sort of invisible at the meetings and was previously known as a liberal), I really think he was highlighting the unbelievableness of the story. I could be wrong and wish we had a secret handshake or something to identify ones who are "awake". If he was trying to highlight the insanity of the "experience", he did a great job.
-
26
Blondie's Comments You Will Not Hear at the 04-03-2011 WT Study (TRIAL)
by blondie inface persecution?.
helped to resist peer pressure.
(a) why can we expect to face trials and.
-
-
Doubting Bro
I think someone from the congo I attend is on here because his comment on paragraph 16 was fantastic!
He said that he has worked with a company that did this type of sewing. He said the typical operator 1) had a lot of experience because most comapnies couldn't take the chance of putting an inexperienced person on the front line and 2) usually paid near minimum wage (in the US). So, he said, for someone with NO experience to even be offered a job was very rare but then to pay that person double the min wage (assuming her old job was the lowest paying one could have) was unbelievable! Then he added, it would have had to been Jehovah because there's no logical explaination for it.
It was classic. I could see the confused look of some. I immediately looked at my wife with a "that's really unbelievable" expression and she just averted her eyes. She knew that story couldn't have been true.
I can't wait for the one coming up in a few months talking about a person in Ethiopia turning down a scholarship that appears out of nowhere and then being offered a job making 3000 euros a month. That one is even more far fetched than this one.
-
23
What % of your Congregation is Pioneering in April?
by Open mind inour family is part of the 32% unappreciative spiritual loser class.
not regular or auxiliary.. .
our congo has 51% aux pioneering in april.. .
-
-
Doubting Bro
YNOT!!! - missed you but glad you're still checking in.
Yeah, ours is around 50% (including the regulars). They've posted a list with the elders and MS names in a different colored font. They actually got 100% participation from the 7 elders and 7 ms which I was shocked to see. Some of those elders have not aux pioneered in at least the 10+ years that I've known them and I think there are one or two that maybe never did. The CO is coming this month which I'm sure put extra pressure on them to do so.
Like OM, I'm in the spiritual loser class (and proud of it).
Sir82 makes a great point about the Memorial invite "work". Those tract campaigns are the easiest FS (other than driving around doing RVs) that your average dub will get.
I think the response was enough to make it an annual event. However, I'll bet the ratios are slightly lower next year as the novelty wears off.
-
9
Did anyone watch the series finale of Big Love?
by jamiebowers inomg, i watched it twice in a row and then watched the wrap-up on hbo.com .
i'm devastated!.
-
-
Doubting Bro
I thought it was a pretty good ending. I also thought that maybe Bill would take over Juniper Creek while Albert was in jail or maybe start his own compound. The scene when he was giving the Easter sermon was a bit weird especially with another flash of Joseph Smith's wife. I guess the whole "women are just around to serve men" thinking finally was turning around. I thought it was interesting that Barb couldn't get baptized in the Reformed LDS church and I even said as she was stepping into the baptismal pool that she wouldn't do it. What I really thought was interesting is that her rejection of his church hurt him more than anything else. After all they've been through, it was a stupid religion that was going to tear them apart. Sound familiar?
At the end of the day, Barb still loved Bill and she had actually grown to love her sister wives as well. Her holding Nikki in the shelter was a moving scene.
Bill had so many people gunning for him that it was a matter of time before he would actually get hurt. The ending was probably best for everyone. The fact that he accepted Barb's priesthood I thought was significant.
The last scene tied up everything pretty well. Ben & Heather get married. Sarah and her family are again part of the clan. Barb has emerged as the spiritual leader and quite frankly she's much better at it than Bill was. Margie cut her hair which seems like a real statement (like a JW growing a beard).
It was a really good series and I'm glad it ended when it did. It was starting to get too crazy.
Interestingly I learned a lot more about the regular LDS and realize how close their structure and cult like ways are similar to JWs. Plus it allowed me to discuss cult tendancies with my wife without the emotion of talking about JWs. Crap, now I need another cult show to watch!!!!
-
12
So presumptuous that they don't realize they're condemned by their own literature.
by miseryloveselders inthis is from the come be my follower publication.
pages 187-189. i highlighted what i found to be ironic.. 14. on the other hand, jesus must be very happy to look down from heaven and see that millions of people are fulfilling the disciple-making commission that he gave his followers before leaving the earth.
(matthew 28:19, 20) what a privilege it is to contribute to the joy of the messianic king!
-
-
Doubting Bro
It doesn't happen that often but I was so close to actually standing up and screaming "you F***ing hypocrites!!!" Folks were going on and on about how the oral law was so nitpicky and how you couldn't eat anything with vinager on the sabboth if you had a sore in your mouth because it was considered practicing medicine or some such nonsense. Yeah, and the WT Talmud isn't anything like that (can't have a beard, discouraging social media, can't watch R rated movies, can't use the YMCA, the blood fraction rulings, etc).
I think the WTS is actually jealous of the Pharisee's position. After all, they had a fair amount of secular power in Jesus day, to the point where they could get people killed. Can you imagine if the local elders or if the GB had that kind of secular influence today? It would make the Taliban look like a bunch of bleeding liberals!!!
Oh, and the bashing of church run charities was also classic. Folks going on and on about how the churches misuse their tax exception and make token attempts at charity. I'm against giving religion a charitable exemption anyway, but even if I could rework the tax code, I would make sure to exclude funds churches spend on soup kitchens and other real charitable activities. Teaching others your beliefs doesn't count in my book. Which means under my ideas, cults like the WTS and Scientology would likely pay taxes and almost all of their profits with very little deductions.
Brazen is a good word to describe that last chapter.
-
61
Wow, This is Getting Tougher!
by Franklin Massey ini'm having a really hard time giving my meeting parts.
i had a service meeting part this week and i could hardly get through it.
i am no longer convinced of some of the things jws teach and so i try to either eliminate those things from my parts, or reword them so that i'm not speaking about that which i do not personally believe.
-
-
Doubting Bro
FM,
I understand exactly what you're going through. I was in the same position for awhile. Pirata's advice was pretty much how I handled it. I also played word games as Miz does and no one seemed to notice. I'm still on the TMS and now only give talks about 3 times a year as opposed to one part a week when I was an elder. Even then, I had a part from the Reasoning book about whether JWs think they have the true religion. So, I spoke in the third person because quite frankly, they do believe they are the true religion. I just couldn't say we because I most certainly do not think that way (anymore).
Prayers were easier for me. I really tried to just focus "we appreciate your Word" as opposed "we appreciate your organization". I'd pray for everyone in the congregation to be strengthened which I meant, just not strengthened to continue doing the bidding of the WTS.
Sometimes I look out in to the audience at the blank faces and I just want to cry. I want to say, "I have doubts. Maybe you do too. It's OK. God isn't going to destroy us for it. Let's start talking about this stuff together."
If that could happen, things would certainly be much better. That's really a shame, isn't it?